Is it true that men spanked their wives before feminists started taking over the world? - men spanked
Someone told me that the men had full powers to break to his wife in the ass when the line to left back in the day. Right?
Is it true that men spanked their wives before feminists started taking over the world? - men spanked
Someone told me that the men had full powers to break to his wife in the ass when the line to left back in the day. Right?
15 comments:
The golden rule was a myth. Who actually are reporting that the cuts had to do for body parts to measure in this case, the thumb could.
To say that men are entitled to had to beat their wives, something true, but it simplifies what happened. The fact is that men can, and what was not widely adopted before feminism, at least here in the United States. I can not for all countries. It was not usual, by all means, but this is not the case.
The way I learned about this in history classes, because the battered woman to be approved, "", some criteria that must be met were:
1. It has been closed. Nobody wanted him.
2. It can cause serious injury or death in particular. All mutilated women were regarded as running water. A man who killed his wife could be charged with murder.
3. It would not be discussed publicly. I guess it could go with # 1.
In general, this is what society deems appropriate. I am sure this is not everywhere, but somehow tmainly covers the southern United States (which is a history class I taught was in the south).
One reason that feminism began, precisely because they suggest not socially acceptable for a man, his wife considerably. This can not be denied. However, we can not say that every man beat his wife. Not everything, like a law. But it was a fairly normal.
Some have, others do not vary with the culture, social class, and man. Since women and children were the property of the majority in many parts of the world, a husband and father, she could deal with as you tend to want it, with their servants, but also social mores to set limits to how far we could go. What feminists tried to the social and economic dependency to suppress the call it impossible for a woman or to leave an abusive situation, which was and is thoroughly deserved, also has an admirable goal, too.
Also, remember that some people, men and women who undergo such treatment as that of their spouse, in this case, the law should not intervene at all.
Yes, true, but may or may not be surprising that there are Christian groups, in which corporal greatly appreciated. Occasionally we have one of those women CSD here for a couple of questions that we ask women, "It was a blow or not the classes now have a man?" Someone should file a bloody sock in his mouth, dass
And, unfortunately, today there are only a few women who are controlled by the thumb of an iron. However, it seems incredible that the man was never allowed to kill his wife, you know that this does not work with him for the President or the death of another man, but has full authority to kill his wife, is another person.
Yes, true, but may or may not be surprising that there are Christian groups, in which corporal greatly appreciated. Occasionally we have one of those women CSD here for a couple of questions that we ask women, "It was a blow or not the classes now have a man?" Someone should file a bloody sock in his mouth, dass
And, unfortunately, today there are only a few women who are controlled by the thumb of an iron. However, it seems incredible that the man was never allowed to kill his wife, you know that this does not work with him for the President or the death of another man, but has full authority to kill his wife, is another person.
Wife-beating was tolerated by society to a point. It has assumed in modern times was, for example, that a person has the right members of his family, who have the power to punish his wife, children and servants. However, in order as head of household should be fair and reasonable in their relations with their subordinates. The accounts of the behavior of people were encouraged to be kind and attentive to their wives.
A poem entitled "The Nine Lives of a wicked woman, which was published in the 16th century, had this to say on the subject:
"Paul has taught us, men
For women to govern our understanding
Not because of the harassment and the tyranny of oil
Because women are the weaker sex.
So to punish his wife,
Only Class Word and Knowledge
Spoke to each other in private
Say: "My dear woman, this
not to do.
It is not just for you
It is shameful and harmful
If you my support and goodwill
They must learn to respect me.
In return, I will obey
NonDo things that I agree with the bad
And you accept me as an honest man
I do not speak harsh words to you.
Live well as friends. "
So to punish his wife, with modesty
And if there is in your honor
It is an obedient wife.
But if he persists
And negate what is appropriate
And he is everything, however, that the application
Ever disobedient and rebellious
You can punish him with blows --
Not always the reason and modesty
So not too bad
Use both a carrot and a stick
How to contact the company.
The golden rule of "origin" is a myth, but I think someone already pretty well covered.
I saw a number of old movies and sitcoms, if the spouse was actually Spank their wives, but most of the time, meant to be funny ... that's pretty bad .. but that's how it was back then.
I agree, it was common that men abuse their wives physically, but not in most households. As always, there are some bad boys, the bad people look .. Also, it will always be people who remind us why we have a lot of love.
Suppose there is a law again, if you invoke the rule that states that a person had provided the right to beat his wife with a stick was no thicker than his thumb. That's what I heard, which may or not be true, but it is an interesting explanation of the rule that "gold".
Suppose there is a law again, if you invoke the rule that states that a person had provided the right to beat his wife with a stick was no thicker than his thumb. That's what I heard, which may or not be true, but it is an interesting explanation of the rule that "gold".
and the cave man to hunt then head to bed, gave her at home for breading and cooking with far fewer complaints in the days that dam Wright to complain about the children and had hit the ball on this issue. : D
I'm sarcastic by
Was legal for men to rape their wives. Then the feminists came and began to spread rumors that the injury was bad.
Damn, they lost everything!
To see old episodes of "I Love Lucy"?
http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/29/sexi ...
Now, about this reality. You can beat their wives to death (not) kill. These behaviors are what the cause really feminists.
The men were allowed by custom and law, with impunity to beat their wives and children.
And have many.
I think that was followed in some societies, the golden rule. "
In other areas, husbands love their wives.
.
The ladies always like a good thrashing. Feminism or feminism.
Post a Comment